Suggestion: Put up the W review.

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Suggestion: Put up the W review.

Post by Mongbert » Sun Nov 16, 2008 5:48 pm

If you're not sure how to go about reviewing it, why not just imagine a different movie and review that?

Post by joerules » Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:33 pm

Yeah i would like to put something together. I've been trying not to think about it but there's no reason not to.

Post by opie301 » Thu Nov 13, 2008 2:16 pm

Joe, I think your discussion points on the movie in the W thread are a sufficient insight into your reaction for the movie. Linking to it is probably just fine. On the other hand, you could probably just put up a short review based on your comments in that thread. That might be the best way to approach it.

Post by mlsterben » Wed Nov 12, 2008 10:38 pm

You could talk about it while ignoring the fact that it's about a real person. That was my mindset when I saw it.

Post by joerules » Wed Nov 12, 2008 10:27 pm

I gave a pretty detailed first response in the W. thread. I suppose I could just link to that.

http://digitalpimponline.com/board/view ... sc&start=0

Post by BucketOfBeavers » Wed Nov 12, 2008 10:21 pm

Hmmm......sometimes watching a movie a second time can give you new insight on it. But with that approach you'd have to shell out more dough (presumably), and basing a review on multiple viewings might violate some set of JLCM standards and practices that I am not aware of.

Or you could just put up something like "I didn't like it" and run off into the night.

Post by joerules » Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:29 pm

I don't know how to approach it. I'm avoiding it.

Suggestion: Put up the W review.

Post by BucketOfBeavers » Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:07 pm

it's missing.

Top