The Avengers movie (Downey, Cheadle)

Discuss anything your little heart desires!

Moderators: chamber715, joerules

Postby IsaacMahomie » Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:36 pm

Yes, he's a master of doing more with less. And characterwise, his touch will be great here. But this is also the Avengers we're talking about. I want to see some crazy fights to go down.
User avatar
IsaacMahomie
 
Posts: 657
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:32 pm
Location: Midwest United States

Postby opie301 » Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:09 pm

The final fight in Serenity? The intimate fight between Mal and The Operative paralleled against the bad-ass moves of River Tam? I thought these were well executed, poetic, and easy to actually follow what was going on.

Honestly, I'm not concerned with his ability to direct a fight sequence.
User avatar
opie301
 
Posts: 4521
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:34 am
Location: Columbus, GA

Postby Silv3r » Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:41 pm

While his ability to direct a fight sequence in my opinion is fine, hopefully with the Avengers they get some good consultants in to advise what to have in the fight sequences, especially for Cap.

The operative in Serenity is about the only male I've seen him direct with some good fighting skills, and even then it was underplayed so he could either dominate or fight against brawlers (i.e. Mal). Whedon's love of powerful women lets us see great action when it's flexible women doing high kicks and whatnot, but I've never really been that impressed by dudes fighting in his work, its usually wide punches and stunted kicks, and thats just not enough in my opinion to make me go "wow". That said, I know Cap is from the forties and fighting wasn't exactly as refined and globalised then as it is now, so I'd expect a lot of tackles and boxing style punches, so I guess weave in some shield throwing in there and Whedon could at least do him justice.

Wow, that was a lot of ranting to get nowhere.
If you're looking in a signature for some astonishing insight into the way things are, keep on lookin'.
User avatar
Silv3r
 
Posts: 1347
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:45 am
Location: Australia

Postby IsaacMahomie » Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:10 am

But this is still Avengers we're talking about. This isn't just one on one fights. I want to see Thor smashing up tanks while Iron Man is shooting down helicopters and jetplanes, all while Captain America and Black Widow are taking on like 20 guys at once with explosions everywhere.
Maybe that's a little exaggerated. But am I the only one here who is expecting more than fist fight and chase scene out of Avengers?
User avatar
IsaacMahomie
 
Posts: 657
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:32 pm
Location: Midwest United States

Postby Silv3r » Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:47 pm

I'm definitely with you on the whole "massive" front Isaac, but I have faith.
If you're looking in a signature for some astonishing insight into the way things are, keep on lookin'.
User avatar
Silv3r
 
Posts: 1347
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:45 am
Location: Australia

Postby IsaacMahomie » Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:33 pm

I'll agree with you there. Due to his other successes, I have "faith" that Whedon will pull it off.

Any word on what HULK's role will be here? I'm hoping for at least one fight between the Avengers and Hulk.
User avatar
IsaacMahomie
 
Posts: 657
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:32 pm
Location: Midwest United States

Postby The Bodyguard » Sat Apr 17, 2010 6:15 pm

Early rumor for the Hulk was that he would be the villain ala Ultimate 1. Don't ask for sources, I heard that sometime last year and I cannot remember where from. But I would be excited to see Hulk telling people he is bigger than Freddie Prinze Jr.


Seriously, the movie would win on that alone.
Image
User avatar
The Bodyguard
 
Posts: 557
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:31 pm
Location: Mobile, AL

Postby opie301 » Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:15 pm

As far as I can tell, they're holding off on a Hulk sequel until after the Avengers crossover. I don't know if this means that a rampaging Hulk will be the focus, a tangential storyline, or if (oh man wouldn't it be cool) Banner gets recruited.

An interesting set of possibilities.
User avatar
opie301
 
Posts: 4521
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:34 am
Location: Columbus, GA

Postby LincM » Sun Apr 18, 2010 11:33 pm

IsaacMahomie wrote:I'll agree with you there. Due to his other successes, I have "faith" that Whedon will pull it off.

Any word on what HULK's role will be here? I'm hoping for at least one fight between the Avengers and Hulk.


I don't want to have Faith, I want the Avengers to have Faith. Five by Five.
User avatar
LincM
 
Posts: 6978
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:31 am
Location: Melbourne

Postby The REAL Brian » Sun Apr 18, 2010 11:51 pm

Just because Whedon hasn't done an out and out superhero movie before doesn't mean he can't. Some of the best received superhero films were done by newcomers to the genre.
Image
User avatar
The REAL Brian
 
Posts: 1505
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:31 am
Location: Ohio

Postby joerules » Mon Apr 19, 2010 1:34 am

The Whedon choice is no more risky than Rami on Spiderman or Favs on Iron Man I think he's proven that he can write (Astonishing X-men) and direct (Serenity) a group adventure. Crafting the story will be the biggest challenge. How do you make these very different characters work in the same world. The source is a good place to start and I think the approach in Ultimates updates it nicely for the real world but we're talking now about properties and franchises colliding. That is easier said than done.
User avatar
joerules
 
Posts: 19126
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 12:43 am
Location: NYC

Postby LincM » Mon Apr 19, 2010 1:58 am

I'm only being facetious about my comments: while I mean them, I'm actually more excited by the prospect than I show. I loved Serenity and welcome seeing what he can do with this film. But I would eat my hat if he doesn't have Dushku and Hannigan. Hannigan would be a perfect Firestar, while Dushku would be an awesome Madame Masque (even though I don't know how you could write them all into it).
User avatar
LincM
 
Posts: 6978
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:31 am
Location: Melbourne

Postby Silv3r » Mon Apr 19, 2010 7:53 pm

I could buy Dushku as Madame Viper. But that would be more of a SHIELD movie than an Avengers one.
If you're looking in a signature for some astonishing insight into the way things are, keep on lookin'.
User avatar
Silv3r
 
Posts: 1347
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:45 am
Location: Australia

Postby LincM » Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:55 am

In as much as the world in general is concerned, a shield movie would actually be an Avengers film. You couldn't actually release a movie with the title "Shield", both because of the TV series and the lack of knowledge of the source material, and people would be confused by a film that included Thor, Fury, Cap etc that wasn't called The Avengers.
User avatar
LincM
 
Posts: 6978
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:31 am
Location: Melbourne

Postby Mongbert » Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:01 am

Whedon has a wide fanbase. I dont love him but I think you'd have to make an effort to mess this up.

You remember how the last Hulk ended? Shots implying Banner had it a lot more under control, and Stark and Ross talking. Really that means it could go either way, recruiting the Hulk would be a good opening scene if theyre not using that to thaw out Cap, I dont think a VS the Hulk would be a strong enough main plot.

Shame about Ant-man though, at least he's started to get a cool portrayal in the comics, that'll have to keep him happy for now.
Mongbert
 
Posts: 482
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 5:24 am

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion Board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Edidaypleatly, fgdbxbsra, Google [Bot], hjtgs1v3w, Pronannuath, Stooftbic and 2 guests

cron